Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Microsurgery ; (6): 41-47, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-469308

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the method and outcomes of radiocarpal joint reconstruction via nonvascularized and vascularized fibular bone graft after distal radius bone and joint defect.Methods Between November,1966 and March,2009,27 cases with distal radius bone and joint defect due to tumor en bolc excision (24 cases) or AO C3 type fractures (3 cases) were treated with nonvascularized or vascularized fibular bone graft.There were 9 males and 18 females.The mean age of these patients at the time of surgery was 27 years (rage from 16 to 67 years).There were 14 left sides and 12 right sides and 1 bilateral side.Nine cases with vascularized and 18 cases with nonvascularized fibular bone graft for radiocarpal joint reconstruction.The bone fixed with plate or/and k-wire.DASH scores,G/W wrist scores,PRWE scores were applied for writ function evaluation and the grasp power recovery rate and bone healing time was also compared during postoperative follow up.Results All 27 patients were followed with an average follow-up time being 9 years (range from 3.5 years to 44.0 years).The average length of fibular bone harvested was 10 cm for vascularized bone graft and 9 cm for nonvascularized.The all fibular bone was healed and the average healing time was 4.7 months (range from 3-8 months).No tumor recurrence or distance metastasis occurred during the follow-up.The average DASH scores was 7.97 (2.5-17.0),G/W scores of 24 patients ranged from 1 to 2,the wrist function result was excellent,account for 88.9%,and 3 cases from 3 to 7,function was good,account for 11.1%; the average grasp power recovery rat was 85.81% (75%-104%); the average PRWE scores were 25.3(10.5-38.0).Comparison outcomes between the nonvascularized and vascularized fibular bone graft for radiocarpal wrist joint reconstruction,there was no significant statistics difference for bone healing time,DASH,G/W,PRWE scores and grasp power recovery rate (P > 0.05).There were no other complications occurred except 3 patients had mild leg pain after long distance walking and 1 case fracture following patient's accident postoperative 11 years,and healed through conservative treatment.Conclusion The nonvascularized or vascularized fibular bone graft is an excellent choice and has less complication with maximal wrist function recovery for radiocarpal joint reconstruction following distal radius bone and joint defect due to all kinds of reasons,such as tumor en bloc excision,distal radius AOC3 type comminuted fracture.The vascularized fibular graft is recommended for larger than 12 cm bone graft.

2.
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma ; (12)2002.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-684376

ABSTRACT

Objective To statistically analyze the 128 cases of thumb abductor defects and evaluate the commonly used operative methods. Methods Statistical analysis and evaluation were done in regard to the muscle strength, injury cause, injured parts, injured nerves and tendon transfer. Results We found by following up after the operation: FDS, PL, ECU were the most commonly used operative methods and their average excellent and good rate was 87.2%. Abductor digiti quinti and flexor pollicis brevis were less used but their effects were good. Conclusion When the median nerve of thenar is injured, the abductor of the thumb will be damaged. We should restore its function by tendon transfer as long as the muscle strength remains and the passive motion of the carpometacarpal joint is good.

3.
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics ; (12)2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-537793

ABSTRACT

Objective To introduce a new optimal operation for the reconstruction of thumb opposition in patients with late median nerve injury. Methods From July 1992 to January 2002, 46 patients of late median nerve injury with loss of thumb abduction were treated surgically by transposition of the flexor pollicis brevis muscle for the reconstruction of thumb opposition. There were 35 males and 11 females aging from 18 to 46 years with the average of 32 years. All of the patients suffered from median nerve injury and nerve repair had been undergone. The interval from injury to the second operation was 2.25 years ranging from 6 months to 4 years. Results All patients were followed up for 4-36 months with an average of 20 months. According to our functional evaluation system designed in 1992, the recovery ratio with favorable function was 100%, no complications and disadvantages were found. Conclusion The new optimal transpositional operation of the flexor pollicis brevis muscle for the reconstruction of thumb opposition is suitable for the patients with late median nerve injury, especially when the ulnar nerve branch to the deep head of the flexor pollicis brevis muscle is uninjured. This method has the following advantages: 1) Minimal operative trauma, only a small incision is required in contrast to the conventional method that need multiple incisions; 2)No other tendon transposition is needed, it does not interfere with other functions of the hand; 3) Postoperatively, it is unnecessary to keep many neighbouring joints in extreme flexion position, except for the thumb in opposition position, movements of all fingers and the wrist are not restrained.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL